The number of male suicides is alarmingly close to the fatalities caused by breast cancer. Furthermore, men are less likely than women to seek higher education or achieve homeownership, and they experience increased levels of loneliness and vulnerability to addiction. Young white men from lower-income backgrounds are facing greater challenges than their fathers did across nearly all economic and social metrics. Today, there is a more pronounced gender gap on college campuses than there was in 1972, the year Title IX was introduced to address sex-based discrimination in education. However, the current landscape of college enrollment and academic achievement now favors women.  What all of these points in videos like this neglect is the main reason why we're such a sick, inverted society: our poisoned food supply and the lack of individualized cell analysis for humans as botanist do for plants.

The dismissive attitude of society is all around us, especially within the family unit:

• Men are told to "shake off" their personal concerns
• They're told "men don't cry"
• They're told to "be strong and brave."
• and many other dismissive concepts from a bygone era when men were tasked with protecting the tribe.  The thing is there's really no more "tribe" to protect!
• When are they recommended to visit an orthomolecular / holistic nutritionist? Most are trained to think these things are "wishy washy" and equate them with trivial concepts and practitioner modalities like energy medicine, chiropractors and others that don't target the nutritional status of their cells.
• Most think "nutrition" is merely the trivial notion of mainly "food" and haven't heard of integrative and/or orthomolecular nutrition (they are the same thing)
• Men are over-represented in prisons and addiction treatment facilties for alcohol and drugs
• Most "holistic" health marketing is geared toward women in the form of non-evidence based modalities

My Personal Story: I Never Got Help Except Endless, Fruitless Visits To "Practitioners" & Endless Shame From Familiy & Society

In a relentless cycle that continues to this day, I have often found myself unfairly labeled as the family scapegoat for a variety of reasons. Those who perpetuated this dynamic seemed solely focused on financial gain, which has become the foundation of the toxic, addiction-ridden environment in which I was raised.

Table Of Contents

This family structure is riddled with hidden allergies, generational trauma, and more. The role of a family scapegoat is one where an individual is unfairly burdened with blame and shame for the family's issues, even when those issues are completely beyond their control. First-born children, particularly males, are often thrust into the position of "head of the family" when a father departs, a role I was also assigned.

Unbeknownst to me, I was not only the scapegoat but also a "sin dumpster," absorbing the family's negativity. Following my parents' divorce, I was wrongfully accused of being the cause of their separation and labeled as "immature" by the lawyer, which prolonged the painful process for four agonizing years. Amidst financial and housing struggles, and lacking proper guidance—especially regarding health—I began to spiral further into despair. Despite this, I managed to stay in school, though countless opportunities slipped through my fingers as I navigated a world filled with unhealthy influences that kept me from reaching my full potential.

Friends and family frequently extended invitations for drinks or tried to involve me in various groups, ranging from religious organizations to nudist communities and the latest diet fads. At the same time, some coworkers urged me to try marijuana and join them for nights filled with heavy drinking, convinced that their lifestyle choices had positively impacted their lives. This tendency towards "self-medication" is a common experience for many of us. Whether it's enjoying a morning coffee, treating ourselves to sweets, attending self-help workshops, engaging in meditation sessions, or participating in weekly religious meetings, these activities often act as subtle forms of self-medication, typically without a comprehensive understanding of their molecular effects.

Below in the following paragraphs are paraphases from the main, below-featured video along with critiques of each points showing the neglect of especially male health that would be alleviated with individualized cell nutritional analysis.  This video below was created by Youtuber, Chris Williamson.

Men are frequently portrayed not as individuals facing their own struggles but as the source of societal issues

One of the most impactful lessons I encountered this year came from Richard Reeves, a prominent author celebrated for his groundbreaking work "Of Boys and Men." He returned to our program for a second time, and our discussion lasted an impressive three hours. Reeves is a keen researcher who explores the complex issues surrounding masculinity and the roles of men and boys in contemporary society. He pointed out a concerning trend: men are frequently perceived not as individuals facing their own struggles but as the source of societal issues. Since 2010, the suicide rate among men under 30 has surged by 40%, with these rates being four times higher than those of young women.

The number of male suicides is alarmingly close to the fatalities caused by breast cancer.

Furthermore, men are less likely than women to seek higher education or achieve homeownership, and they experience increased levels of loneliness and vulnerability to addiction. Young white men from lower-income backgrounds are facing greater challenges than their fathers did across nearly all economic and social metrics. Today, there is a more pronounced gender gap on college campuses than there was in 1972, the year Title IX was introduced to address sex-based discrimination in education. However, the current landscape of college enrollment and academic achievement now favors women.

There is little evidence to indicate that young men are resisting gender equality; instead, they seem to have distanced themselves from the simplistic label and false political paradigm of "the left," which appears to have overlooked their issues. The struggles of young men should not be dismissed as mere conservative backlash; rather, they represent a narrative of elite indifference rather than voter bias. The Democratic Party has not sufficiently tackled these concerns during the Biden Administration, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has failed to acknowledge the gender disparity in suicide rates.

This is the confusing propaganda that misleads us all

There's no such thing as a "balanced diet" & nutrition isn't merely food. Why is that? It's because we're all individuals. Orthomolecular nutrition is the individualized analysis application of the substances within the food which our bodies often do not obtain enough of and are often blocked by antagonists.

The White House Gender Policy Council has yet to tackle issues that primarily impact boys and men

While there are initiatives designed to enhance women's involvement in STEM and construction, there is a glaring lack of programs encouraging men to enter teaching or prioritize mental health. Despite the existence of research initiatives focused on women's health, there is no equivalent office dedicated to men's health. This gap reveals a significant oversight among Democrats and progressive organizations regarding issues related to men, a reality that became particularly clear during the recent election cycle.

Unfortunately, men are often viewed not as individuals facing their own struggles but as the root of societal problems. Richard, a thoughtful and progressive policy analyst, has voiced these concerns, indicating that the seriousness of the situation may be downplayed in public discussions. Throughout this year, many conversations I've had have centered on how to effectively address the challenges faced by men and boys.

It is essential to emphasize that recognizing male issues does not undermine the acknowledgment of women's struggles. This stands in stark contrast to the dialogue surrounding the challenges faced by girls and women, which does not require such clarifications. It is vital to remember that men die by suicide at five times the rate of women; had their suicide rates been similar to those of women, an additional half a million men would have been alive between 1999 and 2020. It’s important to recognize that discussions about the challenges faced by both men and women in today’s society often fall short.

Any focus on men's health/issues as a diversion from women's struggles

Through numerous conversations, I’ve come to understand that many pro-female activists struggle to acknowledge the difficulties that men experience, often viewing any focus on men’s issues as a diversion from women’s struggles. This creates a harmful zero-sum perspective on empathy, suggesting that caring for one group somehow diminishes support for another. Such a viewpoint highlights the fractured nature of our dialogue surrounding gender issues.

For instance, while women can point out that men generally do not face the same risks of sexual assault, men can counter that women are less likely to face the stigma of false allegations. Additionally, we see disparities in various areas: men occupy more CEO roles, yet women are graduating from college at higher rates; there is a significant number of homeless men, while women are overrepresented in sex work.

It’s crucial to foster a more inclusive conversation that recognizes the complexities of these issues without pitting one gender’s struggles against the other. Both sides seem to be entangled in a perplexing social justice dilemma, attempting to quantify the value of false allegations against sexual assault or weigh the worth of female graduates against that of a male CEO. The discourse often devolves into a competition of privilege, where each side claims their oppression is greater than the other's. This approach reduces victimhood to a mere mathematical equation, ignoring the intricate realities that both sides face.

The truth is far too complex to be simplified in such a manner; one group's suffering cannot be equated with another's.

Framing the conversation this way positions everyone as adversaries, which is counterproductive. Acknowledging the struggles of one group does not diminish the importance of another's challenges. Furthermore, discussions about men's issues should not be prefaced with disclaimers about women's struggles, as this can come off as dismissive. The lack of empathy in these exchanges is not only tiresome but also counterproductive, driving a wedge between the groups rather than fostering understanding.

While I may not be able to do much for women directly, I have influential friends who could help facilitate a more constructive dialogue about men's issues, and I am committed to making that happen in any way I can. It's a challenging journey in many respects. Richard shared an intriguing insight about how, when your message isn't being heard—especially after you've been advocating for something for a while—you tend to amplify your voice and increase your intensity. This often happens when you encounter resistance or feel that your ideas are being dismissed. I can certainly relate to that urge to become more passionate and assertive in discussions about these issues.

There are days when I feel particularly fiery, and those are usually the days I try to avoid Twitter. Nevertheless, I’m proud of the work accomplished this year. The conversations I've engaged in have been meaningful, and I hope they've made a positive impact. Yet, there’s still much more to achieve.

Cellular Nutritional Toxicity: Enter "Nutritional Psychology"

A robust body of evidence and "common sense" suggests that individualized nutrition plays a crucial role in determining our susceptibility to environmental threats. Therefore, it is essential to recognize nutrition as a key factor in human risk assessment. Depending on the type of food consumed, nutrition can either exacerbate or mitigate the adverse health effects linked to environmental pollutants—consider high-fat foods as potential aggravators and antioxidant-rich foods as protectors. The significant differences in individual responses to these risks can often be attributed to personalized dietary choices and intake practices. We advocate for the integration of tailored nutrition and dietary strategies into future environmental studies and risk assessment frameworks. Implementing health-focused, individualized nutrition interventions can be an effective strategy to lower disease risks associated with various environmental toxins. This approach should be factored into cumulative risk assessments and, when applicable, utilized as a means for effective risk reduction.

The workplace presents a unique opportunity to encourage healthy individualized consumption habits, as employees often spend extended hours on the job and typically consume one or two meals during their shifts. Nonetheless, various workplace factors can significantly impact employees' dietary choices, including work hours, shift patterns, physical and mental demands, job stress, and available support. Understanding how these work-related elements influence dietary behaviors is crucial for identifying effective strategies to enhance overall health. Unfortunately, much of the "manosphere" have largely overlooked these associations, leaving many questions unanswered. 

Since much of the "manosphere" concentrates on the psychological aspect and how both genders -- women especially -- present with very poor behavioral patterns in relationships, it would be prudent to take into account the individual cellular nutritional status combined with psychological analyses to show the major impact how the status of your cells strongly influences behavior of both genders.

Growing evidence indicates that the relationships between nutritional status, essential nutrients, and environmental toxins are significant, yet the full scope of these interactions remains largely unexplored. Nutrition and environmental chemicals are intertwined in various ways. This symposium emphasizes heavy metals due to the extensive research conducted on them, but it is crucial to recognize that other substances, such as pesticides, which are intentionally toxic, may pose similar risks. Additionally, it is important to highlight that most people encounter multiple toxicants rather than just one, and the effects of these combined exposures on human health are still largely uncharted.

The connection between gut health, dietary choices, and personality traits such as neuroticism and emotional stability is known as the gut-brain axis. Essential nutrients, including omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants, play a crucial role in promoting neuroplasticity, which in turn boosts our ability to adapt and recover from challenges. Conversely, a poor diet can lead to imbalances in blood sugar and increased inflammation, which may negatively influence traits like conscientiousness and openness.

Numerous interdisciplinary studies have highlighted the significant impact of nutrition on enhancing individuals' physical, mental, and social well-being. One key factor that emerges is personality, which shapes food choices and can serve as an indicator of overall health status. This review seeks to evaluate the existing scientific literature on how personality influences eating habits and to determine if specific personality traits correlate with behaviors that promote a healthier lifestyle overall.

Individualized Nutrition & The Workplace: Forgotten Aspect

The workplace is a critical environment that significantly influences a variety of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes, as highlighted by the social determinants of health framework. The World Health Organization emphasizes the importance of the workplace in shaping dietary habits, noting that individuals often spend up to two-thirds of their waking hours there. Research by Tompa indicates that an employee's health status has a direct correlation with productivity, which can be assessed through metrics such as output per hour worked, output per paid labor hour, output per worker, and output per labor force participant.

Ultimately, the productivity levels of workers contribute to the overall output per capita, serving as an indicator of living standards. Workers face potential health challenges, including workplace accidents, occupational illnesses, and both communicable and non-communicable diseases. Maintaining good health is beneficial not only for individuals but also for the organization as a whole. To enhance worker productivity, various strategies can be implemented, such as improving nutrition, sanitation, education, health promotion, creating a healthy workplace, and focusing on occupational health and safety, as well as overall population health.

Workplace nutrition interventions have been shown to significantly enhance health behaviors, as highlighted by The American Heart Association (AHA). The AHA outlines a comprehensive guideline for these interventions, emphasizing the importance of well-balanced meals (no such thing as we're all individuals) that include low-fat dairy, reduced saturated fats, avoidance of trans fats, increased consumption of fruits and vegetables, whole grains, seafood, lean meats, and the use of salt alternatives.

The Problem: There's No Such Thing as "Balanced Diet"

We've all encountered the saying "eat a balanced diet," but is there truly a one-size-fits-all solution? Absolutely not. Each of us is unique, shaped by various experiences at work, school, and leisure, along with factors like how our epigenome reacts to different stimuli, particularly diet, which in turn influences our genetic expression. Many dietary myths stem from a narrow view that focuses on specific food components rather than whole foods. A more holistic approach to nutrition advocates for the consumption of whole or minimally processed foods, ideally in their most natural state, while limiting ultraprocessed options. This perspective is backed by robust research. By promoting real foods and broader dietary patterns, healthcare providers can help patients dispel myths and offer sound nutritional advice.

A person's cellular nutritional status is crucial for effectively managing various health conditions and promoting overall wellness. Healthy eating habits are associated with lower rates of illness and extended lifespans. However, much of the nutritional guidance often presented as fact is actually based on misconceptions—ideas that lack robust scientific backing. Numerous dietary myths exist regarding micronutrients, which include vitamins and minerals; macronutrients, such as carbohydrates, proteins, and fats; non-nutrients, which are food components not deemed essential for growth or maintenance; and food energy, the stored potential to perform work, typically measured in calories. 

The truth is that a treatment that benefits one individual with a specific illness may have little to no impact on another person with the same issue, and could even worsen the situation for a third. This is particularly evident in the realms of cellular nutrition and metabolic function. Have you ever considered why you developed this illness or "condition" in the first place? Often, it stems from a malfunctioning metabolism and cellular structure that has been present since birth, or a unique metabolic process that diverges from the norm, rather than a defect, which may have been at play for many years before the condition became apparent.

Why Is There No Such Thing As A "Balanced Diet?"

Researchers have discovered distinct physiological changes that manifest in the body due to deficiencies in specific nutrients. By analyzing this "body language," we can accurately identify whether there are shortages or surpluses of certain vitamins, minerals, proteins, and more. This methodology is referred to as "nutritional symptomatology," which focuses on interpreting physical indicators to reveal the underlying causes of these nutritional imbalances.

This technique is especially beneficial for detecting subclinical deficiencies that standard laboratory tests might overlook. It’s essential to note that in this context, "symptomatology" relates to the examination of nutritional imbalances rather than symptoms of disease. Every person has a unique biochemical profile. Just like our fingerprints, voices, and physical traits differ, so do our nutritional needs. Each body reacts uniquely to the same dietary inputs. Our individual metabolisms create diverse requirements for nutrients.

Some foods and supplements may be absorbed at varying rates, either too rapidly or too slowly. Furthermore, certain nutritional components might be nearly nonexistent in our systems, while others could be produced in adequate amounts by our bodies, making additional intake unnecessary. Nutritional symptomatology stands out as the most reliable approach for evaluating an individual's nutritional health. It brings to light deficiencies that can be remedied through dietary modifications or supplementation. By regularly conducting these assessments throughout a nutritional program, we can effectively track a participant's progress.

This approach provides a more profound understanding compared to conventional food consumption surveys. Traditional evaluations of dietary intake often overlook critical factors such as soil health, harvest timing, pesticide use, and cooking methods, all of which can significantly affect the nutrient content of the foods we eat. Moreover, these assessments typically do not consider the considerable differences in nutrient absorption rates among individuals. What we eat may not necessarily align with what truly nourishes our bodies. Additionally, some people may need several hundred or even thousands of times more of a particular nutrient than what standard "experts" suggest is sufficient for survival.

Research indicates that such interventions can lead to improved dietary habits and increased physical activity among employees, ultimately reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, Hochart and Lang have noted that nutrition education programs in the workplace can boost productivity, decrease absenteeism, and lower healthcare costs for employees.

Therefore, it is crucial to implement strategies that promote better individualized nutrition and health among workers in every organization. There is a pressing need to evaluate the impact of health and nutrition interventions in the workplace. Currently, systematic reviews tend to focus on vulnerable populations like school children, adolescents, and pregnant women, leaving a gap in research regarding adult workers. Consequently, many companies, particularly small to medium enterprises (SMEs), do not prioritize nutrition and health education in their policies. 

References

Effectiveness of nutrition in the workplace