MAID has become an extremely profitable business for our government, due to the fact mandatory organ donation is a condition for being approved, resulting in Canada now being listed as a global leader in the assisted suicide of its citizens and organ harvesting.

And now this... Can a baby consent to assisted suicide? (source)

Canada has recently broadened its assisted suicide laws to include infants, which has sparked controversy. Critics argue that this expansion could potentially lead to a state-sanctioned regime that allows the killing of babies for profit. They claim that this move is driven by the desire to exploit the organs of healthy children for the organ harvesting trade.

Table Of Contents

Canada's "progressive" euthanasia legislation has resulted in an alarming trend, with an average of 36 individuals being administered euthanasia by the government on a daily basis. Health Canada's latest report on government-assisted suicide reveals that euthanasia now accounts for 4.1% of all deaths across the country.

This percentage marks a significant increase from the previous year's figure of 3.3%. The recently published fourth annual report on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) for 2022 discloses that since its legalization in 2016, euthanasia has claimed the lives of nearly 45,000 Canadians.

In the year of MAID's legalization, 1,018 Canadians chose to end their lives through government-assisted suicide. However, in 2022, this number skyrocketed to a staggering 13,241, resulting in an average of 36 euthanizations per day. This translates to an average annual growth rate of 31.1% since 2019. The data further reveals that 81% of written requests for MAID were approved. Interestingly, out of the remaining 19%, only 3.5% of applicants were deemed ineligible for MAID, and this percentage has been steadily declining since 2019 (source).

Why Are People So Sick That They Need "Medically Assisted Suicide" And Forced To Donate Their Organs As A Condition?

You guessed it: most of them have had a lifetime of generalized health treatment and advice even if they are consuming "good food" which most don't.  The facts speak for themselves:

• Chronic diseases affect a significant portion of Canada's adult population, with over 50% of those aged 20 and above experiencing one or more of these long-lasting illnesses.
• The social and economic impact of chronic disease is substantial, with direct healthcare costs totaling $68 billion and productivity losses amounting to $122 billion.
• Ontario's Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care recommends a proactive, integrated approach to managing chronic disease that prioritizes patient navigation. Despite calls for a preventative model, we have yet to shift away from an acute care-focused paradigm.

Why Is This Happening?

The existing state entails a responsive healthcare system that primarily focuses on addressing illnesses in a reactive manner, following an episodic and acute care approach. The Canadian healthcare system, like most health systems globally that were designed in the post-World War 2 era, is a "sick care" system. This means that the system only takes action when someone becomes sick. The system was not designed to prevent the onset of disease but instead to diagnose and treat illness. The Canadian healthcare system is designed around an acute care paradigm, where the focus is to address urgent issues and manage chronic illnesses. Acute illnesses tend to be short, diagnosed easily, and treated with side-effecting causing drugs and surgeries amony many other reductionist strategies.  It is reasonable for this type of care to be provided reactively. Our healthcare system has excelled at providing reactive care for acute illness and must continue to do so.

Many people, especially the elderly and those on fixed incomes and with the mentioned chronic label dis-eases, see no other option other than choosing medically assisted suicide. It's not only elderly that are choosing MAID:  Statistics Canada has delved deeper into the demographic makeup of individuals who have sought MAID, particularly when considering the outcomes of their requests. It is worth noting that there were slightly more male requestors (51.8%) compared to female requestors (48.2%). However, it is also important to mention that a slightly higher percentage of females (7.3%) had their requests deemed ineligible, as opposed to males (6.5%).

This is the confusing propaganda that misleads us all

There's no such thing as a "balanced diet" & nutrition isn't merely food. Why is that? It's because we're all individuals. Orthomolecular nutrition is the individualized analysis application of the substances within the food which our bodies often do not obtain enough of and are often blocked by antagonists.

As the program expands its eligibility criteria to include individuals with "mental illnesses" in 2024, it is anticipated that there will be a very large surge in participation. This may include individuals with conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, which are often misunderstood and stigmatized. Additionally, those who are homeless may also be eligible for the program, as they are at a higher risk for developing health issues due to lack of access to basic necessities like healthcare and housing. By providing support to these individuals, the program aims to improve their overall health and well-being.

Now it's claimed by many sources that eligibility of the MAID program in Canada is expanding to include the euthanasia of infants and children.  

Dr. Louis Roy was simply reciting a statementa statement the college put out nearly a year ago, in December 2021. After reflecting on expanding eligibility criteria for MAID, the college announced it supported the idea of newborn euthanasia in cases with a very poor prognosis and “extreme suffering that cannot be relieved.” It also supported extending MAID to 14- to 17-year-olds and encouraged more public discussion about endorsing euthanasia for seniors “tired of living.” Source

With all the government funding cuts to many programs over the decades, along with political reluctance to adopt systems science and real healthcare rather than "sick care," is it any wonder why Canada has legislated the expansion of medically assisted suicide?

Efforts to integrate health promotion and prevention concepts in the Canadian healthcare system have faced significant challenges due to the entrenched nature of the acute care model. The culture, technologies, and incentive schemes within our healthcare system have created systemic barriers that hinder the incorporation of these important concepts. As a result we have a sick care system in Canada that works like this:

• Healthcare professionals depend on patients to initiate contact with the system when they experience noticeable symptoms.
• Patients are not active participants in their treatment or other interventions prescribed by professionals.
• Clinical visits or encounters primarily focus on addressing symptoms and treatments, rather than taking a holistic approach to identify root causes and prioritize patient-centered care.
• The delivery model does not prioritize promoting a patient's overall health, preventing and delaying diseases, and ensuring seamless care coordination among different healthcare providers.

The current healthcare system's reactive approach is not only costly but also inadequate in catering to the diverse healthcare needs of the population, ranging from the fittest to the most complicated chronically ill patients.

According to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in Ontario, a better strategy to address chronic diseases would involve acknowledging the following:

• Chronic illnesses persist over time and necessitate a proactive and coordinated healthcare system that allows patients to navigate effectively.
• Patients should actively participate in the management of their condition instead of being passive recipients of care.
• A comprehensive approach is essential, involving collaboration between healthcare professionals and individuals from various fields.
• Preventing chronic diseases is possible, and therefore, health promotion and disease prevention strategies should be directed towards the entire population, particularly those at risk.

Over the past forty years, numerous health agencies have consistently promoted a model that prioritizes prevention and delaying the occurrence of diseases as the most effective approach to address the escalating challenge of chronic illnesses.